Victor Oscar Eyo1*, Arong Gabriel A.2, Opeh Patience Bassey3
Article Type: RESEARCH ARTICLE
Citation:
Citation: Victor Oscar, Arong Gabriel A, Opeh Patience Bassey (2022) Effects of Weevil Infested Feed on the Fecundity and Gonadal Development of the African Catfish Clarias gariepinus (BURCHELL 1822). J Agri Sci Agrotech.
Copyright:
Copyright: © 2022 Victor Oscar, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Publication history:
Received date: 2022-02-02
Accepted date: 2022-02-17
Published date: 2022-05-13
10.56391/JASA.2022.1003
This study was carried out for 126 days to evaluate the effects of weevil infested feed on the fecundity and gonadal development of the African Catfish Clariasgariepinus. Six (6) tarpaulin tanks (100 by 80 by 100 cm3) were stocked randomly with twenty (20) healthy post fingerlings of C. gariepinus with a mean initial bulk body weight 320.58 ± 1.24 g and total length 11.62 ± 0.36 cm. Coppens feed (42% crude protein) was divided into two groups including group A (control feed) and group B (weevil infested feed) and fed to the experimental fishes in triplicate group twice daily at 8.00 am and 4.00 pm at 3% of their body weight. Results showed a significant deterioration (P<0.05) in the proximate composition of weevil infested feed compared to the control feed. Mean fecundity of fish fed the control diet (27,440 ± 670.03 eggs) was significantly higher (P<0.05) than fish fed weevil infested feed (19,100 ± 650.00 eggs).A linear relationship and positive significant correlation (P>0.05) was obtained between fecundity of C. gariepinus fed the two diets and body parameters (total length, body weight, ovary weight, and mean egg diameter) except total length and total weight of fish fed weevil infested feed which showed a negative significant (P<0.05) relationship. Mean female gonad weight, female GSI and male gonad weight of fish fed the control was significantly better (P < 0.05) than fish fed weevil infested feed whereas male GSI showed no significant (P > 0.05) variation. Histological examination showed that the interstitial cells of the testes and oocytes were fully matured and normally distributed. Based on these findings, infestation of weevil in fish feed may lead to loss or deterioration of feed condition, quality, palatability, odor and taste which may affect feed acceptability. It is concluded that to obtain high fecundity and a better gonad development, weevil infested feed should be avoided. Feed should be stored in a good hygienic and sanitary conditions and infested feed should be destroyed with a serious implementation of sanitation and prevention practices to prevent the infestation from recurrence.
Weevil Infested Feed; Fecundity; Gonadal Development; Clarias Gariepinus; Oocytes; Testes.
Fish and fisheries products are highly rich in essential micronutrients [1] and serves globally as a useful supplement in diets lacking essential protein, vitamins and minerals. The global demand for fish protein is driven by an increasing global population, increasing awareness of the health benefits of consumption of fish and other aquatic products and steady decline in capture fisheries. Majority of fish farmers in Nigeria cultivate the African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) which is a member of the family Clariidae to other species. This preference is attributed to its speedy growth and gonad formation in artificial culture environment, excessive fecundity, ability to tolerate a fluctuations in environmental conditions, high immunity and disease resistance, acceptability of artificially compounded feed, good taste, flavour and meat quality, ease of artificial seed production and excellent market value [2]. Fecundity which describes the number of eggs in the ovary of a gravid fish is useful in the assessment of fish stock, size of standing stock, exploited stock prediction, eggs and early life stages study, recruitment of back shell and fin fish species [3]. Information of fecundity is carefully considered during selection of fish species for aquaculture purpose [4]. Gonad is the reproductive organ where germ cells differentiate into female and male gamete [5]. Gonad development in fish which could be assessed by values of gonadosomatic index, gonad weight and gonad gross morphology is useful in evaluation of fish maturity, reproductive capacity and success of fish. Aquaculture feed being a major input in fish production accounts for about 70 % of the gross production cost [2], [6], [7], [8] and [9]. One of the threats undermining the growth of aquaculture in Nigeria is ineffective management of aquaculture feed such as poor storage and unhygienic conditions leading to insect infestation on the feed. Presently, the impact of global pandemic (Covid-19), unstable and fragile Nigerian economy has resulted on importation restriction of goods and services such as foreign feed. However, importers that have clearance to import undergo strict and difficult screening and highly expensive procedures for their goods. Upon arrival of these foreign feeds, farmers already facing feed scarcity prefer to buy and store large quantity of that could be used for more than one production cycle. The presence of feeding pest species such as insects and rodents in feed storage area is often overlooked by many farmers but could pose a very serious health and financial risk to the cultured fish and fish farmer. The feeding activities of these pests could result in contamination and deterioration in the nutrient quality of infested feed. Warehouse beetles and grain weevil can bore through feed sacks, providing an entry point for other insect and may also expose the feed to air penetration. According to [3], harmful compounds and allergens are produced by these pests during feeding which contaminate the grains. Apart from consuming feed, these pests also create suitable environmental storage condition that could promote the growth of mold. Moreover, these pests could serve as potential vectors for transmission of diseases to fish and human. Fecundity and gonad formation in different fish species has been documented to be negatively or positively impacted by feed quality [2], [6], [10], [11], [12], [13] and [15]. Presently, literature review shows paucity of information on the effects of weevil infested fish feed on fish reproductive biology such as fecundity and gonad development. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of weevil infested feed on the fecundity and gonad development of the African Catfish (C. gariepinus).
In this study, 2 mm size of Coppens feed containing 42% crude protein was used as the experimental feed. The experimental feed was purchased from a fish feed outlet in Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria. The feed was divided into two groups, group A and group B. Group A was the control feed and group B was exposed to weevil infestation.
Adult unsexed weevils of between one and fifteen days were collected from infested grains such as maize and cultured in the laboratory and in a plastic bucket containing 3 kg of Coppens feed. A total of 150 weevils were introduced into the plastic bucket containing the feed. Thereafter, muslin cloth and rubber band was used in covering the bucket to prevent the weevils from escaping. The weevils were allowed to infest the feed for 7 days.
Proximate analysis of the two experimental diets was performed according to [15], in the Faculty of Agriculture Central Laboratory, University of Calabar. The moisture content, crude protein, lipids content, ash and carbohydrate contents was analyzed as shown in (table 1).
Proximate Indices |
Feed A (Control) |
Feed B (Weevil Infested Feed) |
Crude Protein |
41.18 ± 0.02a |
34.26 ± 0.03b |
Crude Fat |
7.82 ± 0.01a |
6.41 ± 0.01b |
Moisture |
5.60 ± 0.03a |
5.02 ± 0.02b |
Ash |
1.64 ± 0.02a |
1.75 ± 0.02b |
Lipid |
2.63 ± 0.01a |
2.44 ± 0.03b |
NFE |
41.13 ± 0.02a |
50.12 ± 0.02b |
#WIF = Weevil infested feed, NFE = Nitrogen free extract. Mean with different superscript are significantly different (P<0.05)
Table 1: Proximate Analysis of the dry matter (mg/100 g) of the experimental feed
This study was carried out for 126 days using 6 tarpaulin units measuring 100 by 80 by 100 cm. The 6 tarpaulin units were labelled A1, A2, A3, B1, B2 and B3 to aid triplication of the experiment. A total of 120 healthy post fingerlings of C. gariepinus was purchased from the University of Calabar fish farm and stocked in each of the 6 experimental units (15 in each unit). The stocked fish were acclimated for 14 days before the start of the feeding experiment. During the acclimation period the fish were fed twice daily to satiation with Coppens feed. At the start of the experiment, the acclimated fish were starved for 24 hours. Thereafter, the average initial wet body weight of the fish in each experimental unit was measured using a METLAR MT-5000D electronic balance to the nearest gram [8]. Fish in units A1, A2 and A3 were fed Feed A (control) and fish in units B1, B2 and B3 were fed Feed B (weevil infested feed).The experimental fishes were fed twice daily 9.00 am and 5.00 pm at 3 % of their body weight. Total length (TL-cm) and total weight (TW-g) were measured fortnightly. Total length was measured from snout to the base of the caudal fin rays to the nearest 0.1 cm using measuring board while fish bulk weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 g using Metlar-2000D electronic weighing balance.
Fecundity was estimated according to [16] by multiplying the weight of the egg mass by number of egg per gram of egg mass. All the females fed the different experimental diets were collected and used for fecundity estimation. Before counting the eggs, the total length (TL-cm), total weight (TW-g) and Ovary weight (OW-g) were measured. The fishes were carefully dissected to remove the ovary for measurement of the ovary weight using Metlar-2000D electronic balance. Sub-samples of the ovary (1 g) was cut off from different parts of the ovary (posterior, middle and anterior part) and preserved in Gilson fluid to harden the tissues for easy separation and counting of the eggs. Forty (40) fresh eggs were randomly collected from the ovaries of each fish for measurement of egg diameter using a stereo microscope with ocular eye piece. For the pear-shaped eggs, the mean diameters of the long and short axes was taken as the diameter of the oocyte.
Gonasomatic index (GSI) and was calculated according to [17] as follows:
GSI = (Gonad weight (g)/ Whole fish weight (g))*100
For gonad gross morphology, the male testis and female ovary of fish from the two experimental units were subjected to histological analysis. The gonad were fixed in Bouin’s fluid for 48 hours, manually processed and sectioned at 10 µ with a rotary microtome, dewaxed in xylene, stained with haematoxylin and eosin standard method [18] for microscopic examinations.
Water quality parameters of the fish tanks were measured bi-weekly throughout the experimental period. The parameters include dissolved oxygen (mg/L), pH, temperature (?C) and ammonia (mg/L). Dissolved oxygen was measured using oxygen meter, pH was measured with pH meter and temperature was measured with mercury in glass thermometer.
Student’s T-test was used to test the experimental data for significance using Predictive Analytical Software (PASW) windows software program for statistical analysis (version 18.0). Effects with a probability of (P<0.05) was considered significant. Correlation and regression analyses was used to determine the relationship between fecundity and body parameters of fish fed the two experimental diets using Microsoft excel program (2013).
Fecundity of C. gariepinus fedthe experimental diets (Table 2) showed that in fish fed Feed A (control), fecundity ranged between 22,400 eggs for fish with body weight of 365 g, total length (34.4 cm), ovary weight (32 g) and mean egg diameter (1.23 mm) to 31,500 eggs for fish with body weight of 441 g, total length (40.0 cm), ovary weight (45 g) and mean egg diameter (1.30 mm) with a mean of 27,440 ± 670.03 eggs. In fish fed Feed B (weevil infested feed), fecundity ranged between 14,700 eggs for fish with body weight of 342 g, total length (35.0 cm), ovary weight (21 g) and mean egg diameter (1.27 mm) to 23,100 eggs for fish with body weight of 345 g, total length (35.1 cm), ovary weight (33 g) and mean egg diameter (1.29 mm) with a mean of 19,100 ± 654eggs.
Parameters |
Feed A (Control) |
Feed B (Weevil infested feed) |
Mean Weight (g) |
418.53 ± 10.45a |
338.00 ± 3.42b |
Mean Length (cm) |
38.52 ± 0.58a |
34.57 ± 0.31b |
Mean Ovary Weight (g) |
39.20 ± 0.96a |
27.29 ± 0.94b |
Mean Egg Diameter (mm) |
1.30 ± 0.05a |
1.20 ± 0.04a |
Mean Fecundity |
27440 ±670.03a |
19100 ± 654.00b |
#WIF = Weevil infested feed, mean with the same superscript are not significantly different (P>0.05)
Table 2: Fecundity of C. gariepinus fed the experimental diets
Fecundity of C. gariepinus fed the two experimental feeds showed a linear relationship with body parameters (total length, body weight, ovary weight, and mean egg diameter). Correlation co-efficient (r) showed a positive significant (P<0.05) relationship between fecundity of C. gariepinus fed feed A (control) with all the body parameters (total length, body weight, ovary weight, and mean egg diameter). For fish fed feed B (weevil infested feed), correlation co-efficient (r) showed a positive significant (P<0.05) relationship between fecundity of with ovary weight and mean egg diameter and negative relationship withtotal length and total weight. (Table 3) and Figure 1 – 8 shows the power regression equation for fecundity and body parameters of fish fed the two experimental diets.
Relationship |
||||||||
Feed |
Ordinate |
Abscissa |
N |
a |
b |
R |
r2 |
Significance of r at 5% level |
Control feed |
Fecundity (F) |
TW (g) |
15 |
266.01 |
0.7678 |
0.7599 |
0.5775 |
Significant |
Fecundity (F) |
TL (cm) |
15 |
517.29 |
1.0689 |
0.6406 |
0.4104 |
Significant |
|
Fecundity (F) |
OW (g) |
15 |
700 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Significant |
|
Fecundity (F) |
MED (mm) |
15 |
30451 |
0.414 |
0.6505 |
0.4232 |
Significant |
|
Weevil infested feed |
Fecundity (F) |
TW (g) |
14 |
26763 |
-0.059 |
0.0548 |
0.003 |
Not Significant |
Fecundity (F) |
TL (cm) |
14 |
239113 |
0.716 |
0.0583 |
0.0034 |
Not Significant |
|
Fecundity (F) |
OW (g) |
14 |
700 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Significant |
|
Fecundity (F) |
MED (mm) |
14 |
22270 |
0.0255 |
0.8031 |
0.645 |
Significant |
#TW = Total Weight in g, TL = Total length in cm, OW = Ovary Weight in g and MED = Mean Egg Diameter in mm. Pearson’s product moment correlation value for df for14 is 0.532and 13 is 0.553 at P = 0.05.
Table 3: Values of regression coefficient 'b' intercept 'a' and coefficient of correlation 'r' in relationship between fecundity and total length (F/TL) for female C. gariepinus fed the Control diet. Equation; y = a+ bx.
|
Figure 1: Relationship between fecundity and total weight (TW-g) of C. gariepinus fed Control feed
|
Figure 2: Relationship between fecundity and total length (TL-cm) of C. gariepinus fed Control feed
|
Figure 3: Relationship between fecundity and ovary weight (OW-g) of C. gariepinus fed Control feed
|
Figure 4: Relationship between fecundity and mean egg diameter (MED-mm) of C. gariepinus fed Control feed
|
Figure 5: Relationship between fecundity and total weight (TW-g) of C. gariepinus fed Weevil Infested feed (WIF)
|
Figure 6: Relationship between fecundity and total length (TL-cm) of C. gariepinus fed Weevil Infested feed (WIF)
|
Figure 7: Relationship between fecundity and ovary weight (OW-g) of C. gariepinus fed Weevil Infested feed (WIF)
|
Figure 8: Relationship between fecundity and mean egg diameter (MED-mm) of C. gariepinus fed Weevil Infested feed (WIF)
Results obtained for the gonadosomatic index (GSI) of female C. gariepinus fedthe experimental diets (Table 4) showed that in fish fed Feed A (control), GSI ranged between 8.02 % for fish with body weight of 486 g, total length (41.8 cm) and ovary weight (39 g) to 10.34 % for fish with body weight of 416 g, total length (37.5 cm) and ovary weight (43 g), with a mean of 9.38 ± 0.16 %. For fish fed Feed B (weevil infested feed), GSI ranged between 6.14 % for fish with body weight of 342 g, total length (35.0 cm) and ovary weight (21 g) to 9.57 % for fish with body weight of 345 g, total length (35.1 cm) and ovary weight (33 g), with a mean of 8.09 ± 0.29 %.
Parameters |
Feed A (Control) |
Feed B (WIF) |
Mean Weight (g) |
418.53 ± 10.45a |
338.00 ± 3.42b |
Mean Length (cm) |
38.52 ± 0.58a |
34.57 ± 0.31b |
Mean Gonad Weight (g) |
39.20 ± 0.96a |
27.29 ± 0.94b |
Mean GSI (%) |
9.38 ± 0.16a |
8.09 ± 0.29b |
#WIF = Weevil infested feed, mean with the same superscript are not significantly different (P>0.05)
Table 4: Gonadosomatic Index (GSI) of female C. gariepinus fed the experimental diets
Results obtained for the gonadosomatic index (GSI) of male C. gariepinus fedthe experimental diets (Table 5) showed that in fish fed Feed A (control), GSI ranged between 0.51 % for fish with body weight of 392 g, total length (40.1 cm) and gonad weight (2 g) to 0.95 % for fish with body weight of 422 g, total length (38.4 cm) and gonad weight (4 g), with a mean of 0.78 ± 0.03 %. For fish fed Feed B (weevil infested feed), GSI ranged between 0.57 % for fish with body weight of 349 g, total length (35.3 cm) and ovary weight (3 g) to 0.92 % for fish with body weight of 326 g, total length (33.5 cm) and ovary weight (3 g), with a mean of 0.72 ± 0.45 %.
Parameters |
Feed A (Control) |
Feed B (WIF) |
Mean Weight (g) |
408.17 ± 8.78a |
334.25 ± 2.86b |
Mean Length (cm) |
39.90 ± 0.49a |
34.08 ± 0.35b |
Mean Gonad Weight (g) |
3.17 ± 0.17a |
2.42 ± 0.15b |
Mean GSI (%) |
0.78 ± 0.03a |
0.72 ± 0.45a |
#WIF = Weevil infested feed, mean with the same superscript are not significantly different (P>0.05)
Table 5: Gonadosomatic Index (GSI) of Male C. gariepinus fed the experimental diets
The histological sections of testes and ovaries of fish fed the two experimental diets showed that there was a normal distribution of testicular and ovarian cells in their developments. Theinterstitial cells of the male testes were normal (Figure 9: Plate 1) and thefemale oocytes (Figure 9: Plate 2) were fully matured.
Figure 9: Plate 1- Histological sections of testes of fish fed the control diet (a) and weevil infested feed (b). Arrow indicates normal distribution of spermatocytes in the semniferous tubules. Scy: Spematocytes, ST: Semniferous tubules (X 40, H&E stains).
Figure: 10: Plate 2- Histological sections of ovaries of fish fed the control diet (a) and weevil infested feed (b). Arrow indicates normal structure of ovarian lamellaecontaining the oocytes. N: nucleus (X 40, H&E stains).
Results obtained for mean water quality parameters of the experimental units (Table 6) showed that in tarpaulin tank A fed the control diet, mean water temperature ranged from 28.67± 0.33 (°C) in week 4 to 30.00± 0.33 (°C) in week 12 and week 16. In tarpaulin tank B fed with weevil infested feed, mean water temperature ranged from 29.00 ± 0.00 (°C) in week 2, 4 and 10 to 30.00 ± 0.33(°C) in week 16.
Mean dissolved oxygen (mg/l) in tarpaulin tank A (control) ranged between 4.03 ± 0.03 mg/l in week 6 to 4.80 ± 0.00 mg/l in week 0. In tarpaulin tank B fed with weevil infested feed, mean dissolved oxygen (mg/l) ranged between 4.03 ± 0.03 mg/l to 4.80 ± 0.00 mg/l in week 0. Mean pH in tarpaulin tank A (control) ranged between 6.67 ± 0.03 in week 6 and 8 to 7.20 ± 0.00 in week 0. In tarpaulin tank B fed with weevil infested feed, mean pH ranged between 6.73 ± 0.03 in week 2 to 7.20 ± 0.00 in week 0.
Period |
Tarpaulin tank A (Control Feed) |
Tarpaulin tank B (weevil infested feed) |
||||
Tempt (°C) |
DO (mg/l) |
pH |
Tempt (°C) |
DO (mg/l) |
pH |
|
Week 0 |
30.00 ± 0.00 |
4.80 ± 0.00 |
7.20 ± 0.00 |
30.00 ± 0.00 |
4.80 ± 0.00 |
7.20 ± 0.00 |
Week 2 |
29.33 ± 0.33 |
4.47 ± 0.03 |
6.77 ± 0.06 |
29.00 ± 0.00 |
4.43 ± 0.03 |
6.73 ± 0.03 |
Week 4 |
28.67± 0.33 |
4.27 ± 0.03 |
6.80 ± 0.06 |
29.00 ± 0.00 |
4.30 ± 0.06 |
6.87 ± 0.03 |
Week 6 |
29.67 ± 0.33 |
4.03 ± 0.03 |
6.67 ± 0.03 |
30.00 ± 0.00 |
4.13 ± 0.03 |
6.83 ± 0.03 |
Week 8 |
30.00 ± 0.00 |
4.17 ±0.03 |
6.67 ± 0.03 |
30.00 ± 0.00 |
4.03 ± 0.03 |
6.77 ± 0.03 |
Week 10 |
29.00 ± 0.00 |
4.23 ± 0.07 |
6.97 ± 0.09 |
29.00 ± 0.00 |
4.17± 0.09 |
6.83 ± 0.03 |
Week 12 |
30.00± 0.33 |
4.13 ± 0.67 |
6.83 ±0.03 |
30.00 ± 0.00 |
4.20 ± 0.06 |
6.80 ± 0.06 |
Week 14 |
29.00 ± 0.00 |
4.24 ± 0.03 |
6.85 ± 0.06 |
29.33 ± 0.33 |
4.15 ± 0.03 |
6.78± 0.03 |
Week 16 |
30.00 ± 0.33 |
4.18 ± 0.07 |
6.92 ± 0.03 |
30.00 ± 0.33 |
4.22 ± 0.03 |
6.82 ± 0.03 |
Week 18 |
29.67 ± 0.33 |
4.25 ± 0.03 |
6.80 ± 0.03 |
29.33 ± 0.33 |
4.10 ± 0.03 |
6.85 ± 0.03 |
Table 6: Mean water quality parameters of the experimental units
In aquaculture and fisheries science, fecundity is considered as a very important aspect of fish culture system because it is the number of eggs carried by a gravid female fish and is also related to the average reproductive trait of fish [19]. Fecundity of the African Catfish (C. gariepinus) have been documented by different authors to be affected by feed type and quality [2], [19] and [20]. Results of this study agrees with findings of other authors including [2], [19], and [20] that fecundity of C. gariepinus can be affected by feed. In this study, results showed that fecundity of C. gariepinus fedthe control diet ranged between 22,400 eggs to 31,500 eggs with a mean of 27,440 ± 670.03 eggs while fecundity of fish fed weevil infested feed ranged between 14,700 eggs to 23,100 eggs with a mean of 19,100 ± 654 eggs. Mean fecundity of fish fed the control diet was significantly higher different (P<0.05) than fecundity of fish fed weevil infested feed. This is an indication that feeding fish with weevil infested feed will negative affect the fecundity of C. gariepinus. According to [21], the quantity and composition of dietary protein are known to affect the fecundity of fish. Significant variation (P<0.05) observed in this study for fecundity of fish fed the two experimental diets could be attributed to the differences in the quality of the two diets. Proximate analysis of the two experimental feed showed that nutrient composition of the control feed including crude protein level, crude fibre, ash, moisture, crude fat and Nitrogen free extract was significantly higher (P<0.05) than that of weevil infested feed. Long-term infestations of insects may negatively impact on feed through loss or deterioration of feed condition, quality, palatability, odor and taste which may make the feed unacceptable. [22] reported a deterioration in nutrient quality of maize exposed to weevil infestation. This implies that weevil infestation in feed could led to deterioration in the nutrient composition of feed and this could result in reduced fecundity as obtained in this study. Comparing the physical quality of the two diets, Feed A (control) was more stable compared to weevil infested feed which disintegrated easily due to the holes bored in the feed pellets by weevil. When weevil infested feed was fed to fish, the feed disintegrated easily in water, allowing the leaching of nutrients into the aquarium water. According to [2] and [8], feed should provide nutrients that are bioavailable for fish for optimal growth and good health. In this study, leaching of nutrients when weevil infested feed was fed to the experimental fish hindered the bioavailability of essential nutrients required for growth and this could be responsible for the low fecundity obtained for fish fed weevil infested feed. Findings of the present study agrees with findings of those of [19] and [20] who reported that utilization of high quality feed will lead to growth of ovaries and increase in fecundity of C. gariepinus. A linear relationship was obtained between fecundity and body parameters (total length, body weight, ovary weight, and mean egg diameter) of C. gariepinus fed the two experimental feeds. However, correlation analysis showed a positive significant (P<0.05) relationship between fecundity of C. gariepinus fed feed A (control) with all the body parameters (total length, body weight, ovary weight, and mean egg diameter). For fish fed feed B (weevil infested feed), there was a positive significant (P<0.05) relationship between fecundity and ovary weight, and mean egg diameterwhereas total length and total weight showed a negative relationship. The significant relationship obtained in this study is similar to findings of [19] and [20] for C. gariepinus fed Coppens and Unical Aqua feed in earthen pond and concrete tank.In fisheries science, gonadal development in fish is commonly evaluated using gonad weight and gonadosomatic index which is the ratio of gonad weight to body weight. According to [2], gonad development in C. gariepinus could be significantly affected by feed quality. Results obtained in this study showed that female gonad weight and female gonadosomatic index (GSI) was significantly higher (P<0.05) I fish fed the control diet compared to fish fed weevil infested feed. Gonadosomatic index (GSI) of female C. gariepinus fedthe control diet ranged between 8.02 % to 10.34 % with a mean of 9.38 ± 0.16 % whereas GSI of female fish fed weevil infested feed ranged between 6.14 % to 9.57 % with a mean of 8.09 ± 0.29 %. Similarly, male gonad weight of fish fed the two experimental diets did not vary significantly (P>0.05) whereas male gonadosomatic index (GSI) was significantly better (P<0.05) in fish fed the control diet. However, male gonadosomatic index (GSI) of C. gariepinus fed Feed A (control) ranged between 0.51 % 0.95 % with a mean of 0.78 ± 0.03 % whereasGSI of male fish fed Feed B (weevil infested feed), ranged between 0.57 % to 0.92 % with a mean of 0.72 ± 0.45 %. This could be attributed to the quality of the two experimental diets which agrees with findings of [2] for C. gariepinus fed Coppens and Unical Aqua feed and [6] for C. gariepinus fed plant and animal-based diets. The histological sections of testes and ovaries of fish fed the two experimental diets revealed a normal distribution of testicular and ovarian cells in their developments. This findings is similar to findings of [2] for C. gariepinus fed Unical Aqua feed and Coppens feed. This findings indicates that weevil infested feed did not impact a negative effect on the oocytes and testicular cells of C. gariepinus. Weevils infested feed only affected the gonad size in C. gariepinus and the implication of this is that in female fish, the fecundity will be reduced since fecundity is directly proportional to gonad size. In aquaculture systems, environmental factors such as temperature, ammonia, photoperiod and dissolved oxygen are known to affect fish growth, fecundity and gonad development [23] and [24]. However, results obtained for physicochemical parameters in this study such as pH, dissolved oxygen and water temperature did not influence fecundity and gonadal development as they were within the recommended level for optimal growth and good health of freshwater fishes [25].
In summary, infestation of weevils in aqua feed has a negative impact on the physical and nutrient quality of feed such as poor stability and leaching of nutrients into pond water which will consequently influence fish growth negatively. Also, long-term infestations of weevils in fish feed insects may lead to loss or deterioration of feed condition, quality, palatability, odor and taste which may affect feed acceptability. Therefore, feeding C. gariepinus with weevil infested aqua feed has resulted in reduced fecundity and poor gonadal development. It is concluded that to obtain high fecundity and a better gonad development, weevils infested feed should be avoided. Feed should be stored in a good hygienic and sanitary conditions and infested feed should be destroyed with a serious implementation of sanitation and prevention practices to prevent the infestation from recurrence.
1. Christine M Moffitt, Lubia CC (2014) The 2014 FAO State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Fisheries. 39 (11): 552-553.
2. Eyo VO, Ekanem AP, Jimmy UU (2014) A comparative study of the gonado-somatic index (GSI) and gonad gross morphology of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) fed Unical aqua feed and Coppens commercial feed. Croatian J Fish. 72 (2): 63-69.
4. Mayer I, Shackey SE, Witthames PR (1989) Aspects of reproductive biology of bass, Decentrarchus labrax L.Fecundity and pattern of oocyte development. J Fish Biol. 33 (4): 609-622.
5. Guraya SS (2000) The biology of gonad development, sex differentiation and maturation and sex reversalin fish: Cellular, molecular and Endocrinological aspects. Proceedings of Indian national Science Academy (PIN-SA). B60: 4 – 5.
6. Ekanem AP, Eteng SU, Nwosu FM, et al. (2012) Comparative study of the growth and gonad development of Clarias gariepinus (Burchell 1822) fed diets with plant and animal-based ingredients in concrete tanks. J Agri Science Tech. 2 (3): 1203-1210.
7. Ekanem AP, Eyo VO, Ndome CB (2010) The effect of diet with different inclusion level of cassava leaf meal (CLM) Manihot utilissima on the growth performance of Heteroclarias fingerlings. J Sci Multi Res. 2 (2): 58-67.
8. Eyo VO, Ekanem AP (2011) Effect of feeding frequency on the growth, food utilization and survival of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) using locally formulated diet. African Journal of Environmental Pollution and Health. 9 (2): 11 – 17.
9. Muzinic LA, Thompson KR, Morris A, et al. (2004) Partial and total replacement of fish meal with soybean meal and brewer’s gains with yeast in practical diets for Autralian red claw crayfish (Cheraxquadrica rinatus). Aquaculture. 230 (4): 359-376.
10. Adewumi AA (2005) The effects of the heating time of soybean for broodstock nutrition on the reproductive performance of C. gariepinus (Burchell 1822). Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, ObafemiAwolowo University, IleIfe, Nigeria, 162p.
11. Asuquo PE, Ekanem AP, Eyo VO, et al. (2012). Effects of diets with Cassava leaf meal (CLM) Manihot utilissima on the growth and fecundity of Clarias gariepinus. African Journal of Bioscience. 5 (1): 49 – 53.
12. Bromage NR, Roberts RJ (1995) Broodstock Manage-ment and Egg and Larval Quality. (1stedn) Osmead, Oxford, UK. Blackwell Science.
13. Ekanem AP, Ekanem IE (2010) Effects of phyto-protein and normal diet on the growth and Gonadal development of Clarias gariepinus. Tropical Environmental Research. 9: 556 – 559.
14. Sotolu AO, Kigbu AA (2011) Growth and gonad quality of Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) broodstock fed varying dietary protein levels. Pakistan Journal of Aquaculture. 7 (2): 61 – 67.
15. AOAC (2000). Association of Official Analytical Chemists International (AOAC). Official methods of analysis. (17thedn). AOAC International.
16. Viveen WJ, Ritcher CJJ, Van-Oordt PGW, et al. (1985). Manual for the culture of the African catfish (Clarias gariepinus). The Netherlands: Directorate General for International Tech. Cooperation. The Hague, p. 93.
17. Bolger J, Connolly PL (1989) The selection of suitable indices for the measurement and analysis of fish condition. J Fish Bio. 34 (2): 171- 182.
18. Bancroft JD, Cook HC (1994) Manual of histopathological techniques and their diagnostic application. (1stedn) Churchill Livingstone, London.
19. Eyo VO, Ekanem AP, Ajom VA (2016) Fecundity studies of the African Catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) fed Coppens and Unical Aqua feed in circular concrete tanks. J Coast Life Med. 4 (7): 930-934.
20. Ekanem AP, Eyo VO, James PU, et al (2013) Effects of Unical Feed on Fecundity and Gonad Development of Clarias gariepinus; A Comparative Study with Coppens Commercial Feed in Earthen Pond. Int J Scien Res. 2 (10): 8-14.
21. Shim KF, Landesman L, Lam TJ (1989) Effect of dietary protein on growth, ovarian development and fecundity in the dwarf gourami Colisa lalia (Hamilton). J Aquat Trop. 4 (3): 111-123.
22. Matovu M, Okello S (2010) Effects of weevil and mould infestation on the nutrient quality of locally stored maize in Uganda. Africa Journal of Animal and Biomedical Sciences. 5 (3): 92 – 98.
23. Joy KP, Krishna A, Haldar C (1992) Comparative Indocrinology and Reprouctive. (1stedn) Springer. New Delhi, Narosa.
24. Maitra SK (1997) Frontiers in Environmental and Metabolic Endocrinology (Burdwan, West Bengal: The University of Burdwan). (1stedn) WorldCat.
25. Boyd CE (1979) Water Quality in Warmwater Fish Ponds. Auburn University Agriculture Experiment Station, Auburn, Alabama. (1stedn) WorldCat.